Home
About Us
Services
New
Links
Contact Us
Copyright Balanced Canine Training, 2006-2008Last Modified August 2008
Testimonials
Articles
Dog Laws
FAQ
The Quest for Balanced TrainingBy IACP member Danny Thomason
More families own dogs than ever before. We bring dogs into our homes and lives for companionship, sporting and working partnerships. Because of this, never before has training the family dog been of more paramount importanceand the advice of “experts” in training dogs been so sought out. Family dog owners are realizing that good dogs rarely happen through osmosis. The responsibilities imparted through dog ownership require the dog to be a good family member they can enjoy and be proud of. As a dog trainer and advisor, I have never witnessed these “experts” falling into such realms of divisiveness, regarding methodology,which leads often to heated debate.The heart of the debate is centered around the various methods, theories and equipment. New technologies and advances in behavioral science offer a staggering number of adaptations and choices. Trainers struggle with when, where and to what degree they can implement new learning with the knowledge and methods they currently possess. Individual trainers come up with their own mix of methods, theories and opinions. Opinions are fueled by emotions; revolving around the way in which we treat and train animals and to what degree we use rewards and corrections in the training process. These issues and opinions have polarized much of the dog training community. The result is forming a divide between trainers and leaving little common ground on which to stand.
An obvious and noticeable split has formed in theoretical, practical and idealist opinions that pits trainers marketing themselves as “Totally Positive Trainers” against their more “Traditional” counterparts. The Totally Positive Trainers (TPT) often construe the Traditional trainer’s use of corrections or aversives as being abusive. The more traditional trainers maintain that a dog cannot totally understand the reward based system without occasionally using a correction for unacceptable behavior at some time during training.Although a segment of Traditionalists may focus on correction based methods, the body of such trainers labeled as “Traditionalists” have not stood still in allowing their methods to evolve. Positive motivation and the use of rewards have been implemented to varying degrees with the vast majority of all trainers. While virtually all trainers agree that rewards are important and the first choice in behavior modification, traditional trainers will not shrink from carefully using a mixture of methods to achieve dependable results.Traditional trainers often cite the fact that one effective correction is kinder than a more long and drawn-out method that may not work. Training results that are time efficient and dependable under distraction are the goals of most traditional training programs. Such trainers believe that a mix of methods is the best route and often use many of the methods embraced by the TPT programs. On the other hand, the Totally Positive Trainers believe, to some extent, in correction. The extent of their belief is to emphasize that the correction be in the form of not rewarding any wrong behaviors. They feel the correction is not giving the dog what he wants or expects. Although the TPT’s are not theoretically totally positive, the omission of any physical correction or aversive has resulted in the adoption of the “Totally Positive” name.Every dog, trainer, owner and environment is different. The traditional trainers believe they need to be able to call on a wide range of techniques and equipment to aid in raising and training a dog to become the companion and partner the owners require. However, they are finding themselves having to defend their philosophies, theories and methods due to the TPT’s insistence that training can be achieved with only positive methods. TPT advocates often imply that anyone not using totally positive methods must be using heavy-handed domination, which is an untruth. The implication is being unfairly used as the main illustration to spawn the market and sell TPT to the established trainers, the public and to the new trainers entering the profession.Many of the new trainers entering the profession are being drawn to the methods of Totally Positive Training and the perfect dream it appears to offer…correction-free training of a dog. The magnetic charm and idealism has numbers growing rapidly with an influx of well intentioned, although often inexperienced new trainers. Almost like a blossoming cult, these new trainers study the works of TPT experts and gurus which profess that all behavior modification and training can be managed or eventually overcome by using only purely positive methods.Some experienced trainers have “crossed over” to the philosophy. They have the zeal of being "Born again", and often preach, rather than teach their new mindset. The TPT’s major arsenal of reasoning is that it is more fun and much easier to teach with food rewards and that owners are at less risk of obtaining incorrect end results. Many of their techniques are marketed as new, somewhat magical elixirs to training and problem solving. While many open minded traditionalists also employ many of the same techniques, they do not believe TPT to be the magic potion for all ailments. They prefer a larger range of methods and approaches from which to select and utilize. There is little doubt that rewarding good behavior, while ignoring undesirable behaviors, has merit and value. It can be used productively with some dogs and in some situations and can achieve results. However, the premise that it is a cure-all for every dog is not scientifically substantiated.The Totally Positive Trainer often has strong feelings and objections to the use of some conventional equipment such as chain or pinch collars. Discussion of electronic equipment often creates such opposition that it seems a war is forthcoming.In many instances, proponents of TPT embrace the use of head collars, which are similar in appearance to the halter commonly used on horses. The tradition based training community often cites this as inconsistency in the TPT theory. They counter that a head collar is a management device that borders on torturous and can be very dangerous to the dog both physically and mentally. Misuse of any equipment can produce these results. Head collars are viewed not as training aides, but as the same heavy-handed domination methods the TPT trainers accuse pinch collars to be.
For the next page of this article, click here.
For a printable version of this document, click here:“The Quest for Balanced Training”